Go to navigation Go to content
Phone: (703) 584-7277
Benjamin W. Glass III & Associates
SHARE YOUR STORY Fill out the quick contact form below to get in touch with the BenGlassLaw team. Tell us your story, and we'll tell you how we can help.
Preferred Way for Us to Contact You:
Phone
Email

Fairfax

  • 3915 Old Lee Highway Suite 22-B
    Fairfax, VA 22030
  • Phone: (703) 584-7277
  • Fax: (703) 783-0686
  • This office is open M-F, 9-5.
  • Get Directions

Alexandria

  • 1010 Cameron St
    Alexandria, VA 22310
  • Phone: (703) 688-3944
  • xThis is a satellite office that is staffed several days a month. Please always call before dropping by!
  • Get Directions

Arlington

  • 1655 Fort Myer Dr #700
    Arlington, VA 22209
  • Phone: (703)591-9829
  • This is a satellite office that is staffed several days a month. Please always call before dropping by!
  • Get Directions

Dumfries

  • 17932 S. Fraley Blvd Suite 400-F
    Dumfries, VA 22026
  • Phone: (703) 988-7607
  • This is a satellite office that is staffed several days a month. Please always call before dropping by!
  • Get Directions

Herndon

  • 13800 Coppermine Road 1st Floor
    Herndon, VA 20171
  • Phone: (703) 544-7868
  • Fax: 703.783.0686
  • This is a satellite office that is staffed several days a month. Please always call before dropping by!
  • Get Directions

Fredericksburg

  • 1135 Heatherstone Dr
    Fredericksburg, VA 22407
  • Phone: (540) 227-4571
  • This is a satellite office that is staffed several days a month. Please always call before dropping by!
  • Get Directions

Lexington

  • PO Box 530
    Lexington, VA 24450
  • Phone: (540)300-2716
  • Lexington attorney Van Hardenbergh graciously allows the use of his office for clients meetings at this location and, with client permission, serves as co-counsel in cases in this area.
  • Get Directions

Manassas

  • 10432 Balls Ford Rd. Suite 300
    Manassas, VA 20109
  • Phone: (703) 988-7656
  • Fax: 703.783.0686
  • This is a satellite office that is staffed several days a month. Please always call before dropping by!
  • Get Directions

Newport News

  • 11836 Canon Blvd Suite 100
    Newport News, VA 23606
  • Phone: (757) 932-9683
  • Newport News attorney Scott Wash is the BenGlassLaw team member at this office.
  • Get Directions

Petersburg

  • 1658 Berkeley Avenue
    Petersburg, VA 23805
  • Phone: (804) 601-1179
  • Petersburg attorney Van Hardenbergh graciously allows us the use of his office for clients meetings in Petersburg and with client permission acts as co-counsel in cases in this area.
  • Get Directions

Quantico - Stafford

  • 800 Corporate Drive, 3rd Floor
    Stafford, VA 22554
  • Phone: (540) 358-1371
  • This is a satellite office that is staffed several days a month. Please always call before dropping by!
  • Get Directions

Reston

  • 12020 Sunrise Valley Dr. Suite 100
    Reston, VA 20191
  • Phone: (703) 988-7721
  • Fax: 703-783-0686
  • This is a satellite office that is staffed several days a month. Please always call before dropping by!
  • Get Directions

Richmond

  • 1506 Willow Lawn Dr. Suite 121
    Richmond, VA 23230
  • Phone: (804) 597-0119
  • Richmond attorney Bob Battle graciously permits us to use this office for client meetings and, with client permission, co-counsels with us on Richmond area cases
  • Get Directions

Virginia Beach

  • 4164 Virginia Beach Blvd Suite 204
    Virginia Beach, VA 23452
  • Phone: (757) 302-7527
  • Virginia Beach attorney Kellam Parks graciously permits us to use this office for client meetings and, with client permission, co-counsels with us on Virginia Beach area cases
  • Get Directions

Williamsburg

  • 809 Richmond Road
    Williamsburg, VA 23185
  • Phone: (757) 296-0594
  • Willaimsburg attorney Stu Spirn graciously permits us to use this office for client meetings and, with client permission, co-counsels with us on Williamsburg area cases
  • Get Directions

A Federal Judge Explains Why ERISA Sucks (Believe Me, It Does)

Comments (1)
If you're interested in the full opinion of Blankenship v. MetLife, be prepared for an astute critique of the problems and shortcomings of ERISA.

Judge William Acker, Jr. of the USDC Northern District of Alabama continued his assault on the judicial application of ERISA recently with his opinion on Blankenship v. Metlife.

Blankenship was a manager at a large Sears Roebuck department store in Alabama who had a significant cardiac history and suffered from advanced heart disease. His treating physicians determined that he was unable to continue working in the stressful environment of his job and he filed for disability. After several reversals on MetLife's part, benefits were denied.

A short time later Blankenship underwent knee surgery and was granted benefits based on that condition. MetLife continued to review the claim and had a vocational specialist review Blankenship's job capabilities. The specialist ignored his heart problem and focused solely on jobs that were open to someone with knee problems. The specialist found several jobs, all of which would have been precluded by his heart condition, and his claim was again denied.

Blankenship appealed again and MetLife had a cardiologist review the file. The cardiologist never addressed the main concern of Blankenship's treating physicians, that the stress of work would cause him further cardiac episodes. Based on the report, MetLife denied the appeal.

In his opinion, Judge Acker is critical of ERISA on several points. First, he cites the problem with ERISA cases being based solely on paper and the fact that the courts purport to make "credibility determinations to resolve disputes between irreconcilable unsworn written testimony."Along with this, the judge questions the weight given to experts for the insurance companies. These experts often present their opinions following a simple file review and without ever having examined the claimant. The opinions of these doctors is then pitted equally against that of the treating physicians.

Second, Acker discusses the inherent conflict of interest that faces the insurers in ERISA cases. The insurers who determine whether or not benefits should be awarded are also the ones that pay out the benefits. The possibility of this conflict and the apparent actions of insurers is certainly enough to suspect that it is indeed an active conflict. Employees make decisions whether or not to give out their employer's money. This conflict also extends to the doctors hired to review the files as many are non-practicing and make their living solely on insurance file reviews. A conflict exists because a doctor who is unwilling to "deny, deny, deny" will lose the insurance company's business and suffer financial loss.

Lastly, the judge harps on the perversion of ERISA, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, a law meant to protect the benefits of American employees by giving them access to the courts following insurance denial. Unfortunately, the courts have defied the spirit of the law and it is now used as a bastion for insurance companies rather than a reprieve for the insured.
Ben Glass
Ben Glass is a nationally recognized Virginia injury, medical malpractice, and long-term disability attorney
1 Comments:
I am experiencing the "fairness" of ERISA and may God help everyone that is forced into the system.
Posted by Roger Martin on October 25, 2010 at 04:39 PM

Post a Comment

To reply to this message, enter your reply in the box labeled "Message", hit "Post Message."

Name:*

Email:* (will not be published)

Message:*

Notify me of follow-up comments via email.