Our staff is standing by to help you. Click to chat.


Charitable immunity is a common law doctrine abolished by most states. This doctrine provides that a charitable entity cannot be sued by a beneficiary who is injured while in its care.
Jimenez's attorney, Benjamin W. Glass III, a personal-injury lawyer based in Fairfax, Va., says:
"The Charitable Immunity law is a holdover from ancient times when charitable organizations depended on contributions to survive. A $32 million business like Didlake, which gets .02 percent of its revenues from donations, should be fully responsible for its carelessness. The original reason for protecting charities in Virginia no longer exists when you are talking about big business."
Jimenez's mother, Iris N. Figueroa-Jiminez, said:
"When I sent my son to Didlake, I trusted that he would be well cared for, and when he broke his leg I was shocked that they failed to take any responsibility whatsoever.
People who use these kinds of services don't know about the Charitable Immunity laws and that employees have no liability in the event of an accident or other injury to a client."
In the lawsuit Didlake denied that its employees did anything wrong, denied that it was "big business" and denied that Juan Jimenez was injured while in its care. Those issues were not litigated due to the Court's ruling that Didlake was entitled to the protection of the charitable immnunity doctrine.
The official trial court ruling on the Didlake lawsuit is here.
Glass anticipates the appeal will be decided in early 2010.
To schedule an interview with Attorney Benjamin Glass, call 703-591-9829. A Q&A sheet on this case is available.